linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 17:47:27 +0200
From:	Joerg Roedel <jroedel@...e.de>
To:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:	Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] of: Implement iterator for phandles

On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:37:44PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 6:54 AM, Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org> wrote:
> > Thanks a lot for your fast reply! I guess these patches will go through
> > the DT tree, or should I carry them in the IOMMU tree? The DT tree
> > probably makes more sense.
> 
> Sure, I can take them.

Thanks! I am about to post a new version with all changes collected
together and rebased to the latest upstream kernel.


	Joerg