linux-kernel - Re: [bisect] Merge tag 'mmc-v4.6' of git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc (was [GIT PULL] MMC for v.4.6)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:00:34 -0700
From:	Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [bisect] Merge tag 'mmc-v4.6' of
 git://git.linaro.org/people/ulf.hansson/mmc (was [GIT PULL] MMC for v.4.6)

On 04/04/2016 12:49 PM, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 12:29 PM, Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> Yeah, a straight revert of 520bd7a8b415 resumes normal service:
> 
> Ok, so we have that as an option.
> 
>> Should I send a proper revert?
> 
> Let's see if somebody can come up with a better serialization model.
> We're only at rc2, and we now have a fallback fix, let's wait a week
> or two to see if the mmc people can come up with something.
> 
> But maybe you can send me a revert patch around rc4 or so if the
> problem still remains, ok?

Will do.

Regards,
Peter Hurley