lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon,  4 Apr 2016 16:26:53 -0700
From:	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@...ts.ubuntu.com
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
	Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
Subject: [PATCH 3.13.y-ckt 89/97] lpfc: fix misleading indentation

3.13.11-ckt38 -stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

---8<------------------------------------------------------------

From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>

commit aeb6641f8ebdd61939f462a8255b316f9bfab707 upstream.

gcc-6 complains about the indentation of the lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array()
call in lpfc_online(), which clearly doesn't look right:

drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c: In function 'lpfc_online':
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2880:3: warning: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Wmisleading-indentation]
   lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
   ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c:2863:2: note: ...this 'if' clause, but it is not
  if (vports != NULL)
  ^~

Looking at the patch that introduced this code, it's clear that the
behavior is correct and the indentation is wrong.

This fixes the indentation and adds curly braces around the previous
if() block for clarity, as that is most likely what caused the code
to be misindented in the first place.

Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Fixes: 549e55cd2a1b ("[SCSI] lpfc 8.2.2 : Fix locking around HBA's port_list")
Reviewed-by: Sebastian Herbszt <herbszt@....de>
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.com>
Reviewed-by: Ewan D. Milne <emilne@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Kamal Mostafa <kamal@...onical.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c | 5 +++--
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
index 68c94cc..39dc1d4 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_init.c
@@ -2697,7 +2697,7 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 	}
 
 	vports = lpfc_create_vport_work_array(phba);
-	if (vports != NULL)
+	if (vports != NULL) {
 		for (i = 0; i <= phba->max_vports && vports[i] != NULL; i++) {
 			struct Scsi_Host *shost;
 			shost = lpfc_shost_from_vport(vports[i]);
@@ -2714,7 +2714,8 @@ lpfc_online(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
 			}
 			spin_unlock_irq(shost->host_lock);
 		}
-		lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
+	}
+	lpfc_destroy_vport_work_array(phba, vports);
 
 	lpfc_unblock_mgmt_io(phba);
 	return 0;
-- 
2.7.4

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ