linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 19:17:39 +0200
From:	luca abeni <luca.abeni@...tn.it>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/7] Improve the tracking of active utilisation

On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 16:48:03 +0200
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 05:12:29PM +0200, Luca Abeni wrote:
> > +	/*
> > +	 * We cannot use inactive_task_timer() to invoke sub_running_bw()
> > +	 * at the 0-lag time, because the task could have been migrated
> > +	 * while SCHED_OTHER in the meanwhile.
> > +	 */
> > +	if (hrtimer_active(&p->dl.inactive_timer) &&
> > +		!hrtimer_callback_running(&p->dl.inactive_timer))
> >  		sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
> 
> hrtimer_is_queued() ?

Uhm... I do not remember why I used this condition, but hrtimer_is_queued()
should be the right thing to be used, yes... I'll update the patch.



			Thanks,
				Luca