linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 5 Apr 2016 11:19:50 -0700
From:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
To:	Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@...sol.com>
Cc:	Pramod Gurav <gpramod@...eaurora.org>, andy.gross@...aro.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
	dan.j.williams@...el.com, okaya@...eaurora.org,
	architt@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Bypass BAM init if Remotely controlled

On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:55:56AM +0200, Stanimir Varbanov wrote:
> On 03/22/2016 11:49 AM, Pramod Gurav wrote:
> > On some QOCM platforms(eg 8996) BAM control registers are managed remotely
> > hence can not be accessed by application processor for writes. So skip the bam_init
> > for any such platform if DT property is set.
> > 
> > Tested on 8996 (BAM Global control is through remote) and DB410C boards.
> > Tested with i2c DMA on these targets which uses BAM as DMA controller.
> 
> I have similar patches at [1] already, could you check them first.

was there an update posted on these? I dont have this series or an update in
my queue

-- 
~Vinod