linux-kernel - Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: Mediatek: Refine mt8173 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 15 Apr 2016 09:56:02 +0800
From:	Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@...iatek.com>
To:	Yingjoe Chen <yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>
CC:	<broonie@...nel.org>, <tiwai@...e.de>,
	<alsa-devel@...a-project.org>, <ir.lian@...iatek.com>,
	<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<koro.chen@...iatek.com>, <linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<PC.Liao@...iatek.com>, <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [RFC PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: Mediatek: Refine mt8173
 driver

On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 20:44 +0800, Yingjoe Chen wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-04-14 at 20:14 +0800, Garlic Tseng wrote:
> > Move mt8173 driver to another folder.
> > 
> > The software control sequence of mt2701 is very different from that of mt8173,
> > so this patch moves mt8173 code to another folder.
> > 
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Garlic Tseng <garlic.tseng@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile                            | 12 +++++-------
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/Makefile                     |  7 +++++++
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-max98090.c      |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-rt5650-rt5514.c |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-rt5650-rt5676.c |  4 ++--
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-rt5650.c        |  2 +-
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mtk-afe-common.h       |  0
> >  sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mtk-afe-pcm.c          |  0
> >  8 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/Makefile
> >  rename sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-max98090.c (99%)
> >  rename sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-rt5650-rt5514.c (99%)
> >  rename sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-rt5650-rt5676.c (99%)
> >  rename sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mt8173-rt5650.c (99%)
> >  rename sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mtk-afe-common.h (100%)
> >  rename sound/soc/mediatek/{ => mt8173}/mtk-afe-pcm.c (100%)
> > 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile b/sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> > index d486860..5048165 100644
> > --- a/sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> > +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/Makefile
> > @@ -1,7 +1,5 @@
> > -# MTK Platform Support
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MEDIATEK) += mtk-afe-pcm.o
> > -# Machine support
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_MAX98090) += mt8173-max98090.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650) += mt8173-rt5650.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650_RT5514) += mt8173-rt5650-rt5514.o
> > -obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650_RT5676) += mt8173-rt5650-rt5676.o
> > +# 8173 Machine support
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_MAX98090) += mt8173/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650_RT5676) += mt8173/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650_RT5514) += mt8173/
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_RT5650) += mt8173/
> 
> Since all CONFIG_SND_SOC_MT8173_* depends on CONFIG_SND_SOC_MEDIATEK,
> you could just do:
> 
> obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MEDIATEK) += mt8173/
> 
> 
> This way we don't need to modify 2 makefiles when adding new ASoC
> driver.

Yes you're right. I'll modify it.

> 
> 
> > diff --git a/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/Makefile b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/Makefile
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..d486860
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/sound/soc/mediatek/mt8173/Makefile
> > @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@
> > +# MTK Platform Support
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_SND_SOC_MEDIATEK) += mtk-afe-pcm.o
> 
> Maybe we should also rename this to mt8173-afe-pcm.o?

Well I agree with you. Maybe I have to check all the files and modify
them with prefix "mt8173" and "mt2701". (or "mtk8173" and "mtk2701"? 
I'm not so sure here)

> 
> Joe.C

Thanks for your comments.