| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 10:56:18 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>
To: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
german.rivera@...escale.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, leoyang.li@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v2] arm64: dts: ls2080a: fsl-mc dt node updates
On Wed, Apr 13, 2016 at 04:05:23PM -0500, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> updates to the fsl-mc node for full functionality:
> -msi-parent is needed for interrupt support
> -ranges is needed to enable the bus driver to translate bus addresses
> -dpmac nodes provide a basis for relating dpmac objects to PHYs
>
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder@....com>
> ---
>
> -v2: updated comment to remove some extraneous info, added
> carriage returns after dpmac nodes
>
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi | 98 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 98 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
> index 9d746c6..15498eb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi
> @@ -265,6 +265,104 @@
> compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc";
> reg = <0x00000008 0x0c000000 0 0x40>, /* MC portal base */
> <0x00000000 0x08340000 0 0x40000>; /* MC control reg */
> + msi-parent = <&its>;
> + #address-cells = <3>;
> + #size-cells = <1>;
> +
> + /*
> + * Region type 0x0 - MC portals
> + * Region type 0x1 - QBMAN portals
> + */
> + ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0x8 0x0c000000 0x4000000
> + 0x1 0x0 0x0 0x8 0x18000000 0x8000000>;
> +
> + /*
> + * Define the maximum number of MACs present on the SoC.
> + */
> + dpmacs {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> +
> + dpmac1: dpmac@1 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <1>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac2: dpmac@2 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <2>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac3: dpmac@3 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <3>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac4: dpmac@4 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <4>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac5: dpmac@5 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <5>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac6: dpmac@6 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <6>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac7: dpmac@7 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <7>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac8: dpmac@8 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <8>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac9: dpmac@9 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <9>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac10: dpmac@10 {
The unit-address should be same as reg property, i.e. both are in hex
value.
Shawn
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0xa>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac11: dpmac@11 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0xb>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac12: dpmac@12 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0xc>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac13: dpmac@13 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0xd>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac14: dpmac@14 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0xe>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac15: dpmac@15 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0xf>;
> + };
> +
> + dpmac16: dpmac@16 {
> + compatible = "fsl,qoriq-mc-dpmac";
> + reg = <0x10>;
> + };
> + };
> };
>
> smmu: iommu@...0000 {
> --
> 1.9.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists