linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv7 00/29] THP-enabled tmpfs/shmem using compound pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 19 Apr 2016 09:11:55 -0700
From:	"Shi, Yang" <yang.shi@...aro.org>
To:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...two.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
	Andres Lagar-Cavilla <andreslc@...gle.com>,
	Ning Qu <quning@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv7 00/29] THP-enabled tmpfs/shmem using compound pages

On 4/19/2016 7:33 AM, Jerome Marchand wrote:
> On 04/19/2016 12:55 AM, Shi, Yang wrote:
>> 2. I ran my THP test (generated a program with 4MB text section) on both
>> x86-64 and ARM64 with yours and Hugh's patches (linux-next tree), I got
>> the program execution time reduced by ~12% on x86-64, it looks very
>> impressive.
>>
>> But, on ARM64, there is just ~3% change, and sometimes huge tmpfs may
>> show even worse data than non-hugepage.
>>
>> Both yours and Hugh's patches has the same behavior.
>>
>> Any idea?
>
> Just a shot in the dark, but what page size do you use? If you use 4k
> pages, then hugepage size should be the same as on x86 and a similar

I do use 4K pages for both x86-64 and ARM64 in my testing.

Thanks,
Yang

> behavior could be expected. Otherwise, hugepages would be too big to be
> taken advantage of by your test program.
>
> Jerome
>