lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 20 Apr 2016 14:34:05 +0000
From:	Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>
To:	Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>
CC:	Linux Bluetooth <linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ganapathi Bhat <gbhat@...vell.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7] Bluetooth: hci_uart: Support firmware download for
 Marvell

Hi Marcel,

Thanks for your review.
We will address these comments in updated version.

> > +
> > +/* Receive data */
> > +static int mrvl_recv(struct hci_uart *hu, const void *data, int
> > +count) {
> > +	struct mrvl_data *mrvl = hu->priv;
> > +
> > +	if (test_bit(HCI_UART_DNLD_FW, &mrvl->flags)) {
> > +		mrvl->fwdata->skb = mrvl_process_fw_data(hu, mrvl->fwdata-
> >skb,
> > +							 (u8 *)data, count);
> > +		if (IS_ERR(mrvl->fwdata->skb)) {
> > +			int err = PTR_ERR(mrvl->fwdata->skb);
> > +
> > +			bt_dev_err(hu->hdev,
> > +				   "Receive firmware data failed (%d)", err);
> > +			mrvl->fwdata->skb = NULL;
> > +			return err;
> > +		}
> > +		return 0;
> > +	}
> 
> This part actually worries me a bit. Yes, we can do it this way, but in
> general it sounds a bit more like we need a generic approach in
> hci_ldisc.c to handle pre-HCI firmware loading and/or setup.
> 
> In the btusb.c driver we added ->setup_on_usb callback. And for it
> sounds like we need something similar here. So that hci_ldisc.c can
> handle most of the basic TX/RX.

Even if we added "->setup_on_usb" in hci_ldisc.c, we will need protocol specific changes in receive path during firmware download.
With this patch, those changes are smoothly handled in hci_mrvl.c file.
[hci_uart_tty_receive] -> [proto->recv] -> [mrvl_recv] -> [normal Rx path/FW download Rx handling]

> > +
> > +static int mrvl_setup(struct hci_uart *hu) {
> > +	struct mrvl_data *mrvl = hu->priv;
> > +
> > +	mrvl_init_fw_data(hu);
> > +	set_bit(HCI_UART_DNLD_FW, &mrvl->flags);
> > +
> > +	return hci_uart_dnld_fw(hu);
> > +}
> 
> So this is clearly the wrong spot. When ->setup is called it is expected
> that HCI is ready. You are misusing it here.
> 

Sure. We will move this to mrvl_open() where HCI is not yet initialized.

Regards,
Amitkumar

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ