| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 14:44:49 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 02/13] clk: Add {devm_}clk_hw_{register,unregister}()
APIs
On 04/21, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> We've largely split the clk consumer and provider APIs along
> struct clk and struct clk_hw, but clk_register() still returns a
> struct clk pointer for each struct clk_hw that's registered.
> Eventually we'd like to only allocate struct clks when there's a
> user, because struct clk is per-user now, so clk_register() needs
> to change.
>
> Let's add new APIs to register struct clk_hws, but this time
> we'll hide the struct clk from the caller by returning an int
> error code. Also add an unregistration API that takes the clk_hw
> structure that was passed to the registration API. This way
> provider drivers never have to deal with a struct clk pointer
> unless they're using the clk consumer APIs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Powered by blists - more mailing lists