linux-kernel - Re: random(4) changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 23 Apr 2016 22:03:23 -0400
From:	Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>
To:	Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@...il.com>
Cc:	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	John Denker <jsd@...n.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Stephan Mueller <smueller@...onox.de>
Subject: Re: random(4) changes

On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 06:27:48PM -0400, Sandy Harris wrote:
> 
> I really like Stephan's idea of simplifying the interrupt handling,
> replacing the multiple entropy-gathering calls in the current driver
> with one routine called for all interrupts. See section 1.2 of his
> doc. That seems to me a much cleaner design, easier both to analyse
> and to optimise as a fast interrupt handler.

The current /dev/random driver *already* has a fast interrupt handler,
and it was designed specifically to be very fast and very lightweight.

It's a fair argument that getting rid of add_disk_randomness()
probably makes sense.  However, add_input_randomness() is useful
because it is also mixing in the HID input (e.g., the characters typed
or the mouse movements), and that is extremely valuable and I wouldn't
want to get rid of this.

> In the current driver -- and I think in Stephan's, though I have not
> looked at his code in any detail, only his paper -- heavy use of
> /dev/urandom or the kernel get_random_bytes() call can deplete the
> entropy available to /dev/random. That can be a serious problem in
> some circumstances, but I think I have a fix.

So /dev/urandom, or preferentially, the getrandom(2) system call,
which will block until the entropy pool is initialized, is designed to
be a CRNG.  We use the entropy accounting for the urandom pool as a
hueristic to know how aggressively to pull the random pool and/or
things like hwrandom (since pulling entropy from the TPM does have
costs, for example power utilization for battery-powered devices).

We already throttle back how much we pull from the input pool if it is
being used heavily, specifically to avoid this problem.

Cheers,

					- Ted