linux-kernel - Re: [-mmots 2016-04-25] hugetlb: error: ‘cpu_has

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 15:00:32 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Cc:	Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [-mmots 2016-04-25] hugetlb: error: ‘cpu_has_pse’ undeclared

On Tue, 26 Apr 2016 23:14:35 +0900 Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com> wrote:

> Hello,
> 
> v4.6-rc5-mmots-2016-04-25-17-33
> 
> 
> In file included from include/linux/hugetlb.h:418:0,
>                  from fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c:28:
> fs/hugetlbfs/inode.c: In function 'init_hugetlbfs_fs':
> ./arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:7:31: error: 'cpu_has_pse' undeclared (first use in this function)
>  #define hugepages_supported() cpu_has_pse
>                                ^

hm, how did that happen.  I had some issues with cpu_has_pse a number
of days ago but they later went away.

In my current tree I have, in arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h:

#define hugepages_supported() boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_PSE)

and that came in from linux-next.patch.  I wonder why your tree is
different.

<looks>

OK, http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/linux-next.patch has no
changes to arch/x86/include/asm/hugetlb.h at all.  Maybe I fat-fingered
something.  Odd.

I have just uploaded a new snapshot - it should be good now.  Sorry about
that.