linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 26 Apr 2016 11:23:14 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>,
	MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
	Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 04/10] regulator: fixed: add support for ACPI interface

On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:24:56AM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:

> The GPIO name might be different in different use cases. For my case,
> it is "vbus_en", but other cases should use the different name.

> On ACPI compatible platforms, GPIO resources are reported via ACPI
> tables and (devm_)gpiod_get() hides the APCI complexity and returns
> the gpiod according to "gpio_name".

That's labelling that you might want to do on the supplier side or at
system level.  Why does the device care?  It's requesting the GPIO in
its own context and it's only requesting one GPIO, with DT we're just
always calling the GPIO "gpio" which works fine.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)