lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 27 Apr 2016 13:37:51 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
To:	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] mm, page_alloc: un-inline the bad part of
 free_pages_check

On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 02:01:14PM +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
> !DEBUG_VM bloat-o-meter:
> 
> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/2 up/down: 124/-383 (-259)
> function                                     old     new   delta
> free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
> free_pcppages_bulk                          1509    1403    -106
> __free_pages_ok                             1025     748    -277
> 
> DEBUG_VM:
> 
> add/remove: 1/0 grow/shrink: 0/1 up/down: 124/-242 (-118)
> function                                     old     new   delta
> free_pages_check_bad                           -     124    +124
> free_pages_prepare                          1048     806    -242
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>

This uninlines the check all right but it also introduces new function
calls into the free path. As it's the free fast path, I suspect it would
be a step in the wrong direction from a performance perspective.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ