linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V17 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: implement lower level hardware interface

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 28 Apr 2016 15:30:07 -0400
From:	Sinan Kaya <okaya@...eaurora.org>
To:	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>
Cc:	dmaengine@...r.kernel.org, timur@...eaurora.org,
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, cov@...eaurora.org, jcm@...hat.com,
	shankerd@...eaurora.org, vikrams@...eaurora.org,
	marc.zyngier@....com, mark.rutland@....com, eric.auger@...aro.org,
	agross@...eaurora.org, arnd@...db.de,
	linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V17 1/3] dmaengine: qcom_hidma: implement lower level
 hardware interface

On 4/26/2016 12:24 PM, Vinod Koul wrote:
>> +
>> > +       dev_err(lldev->dev, "error 0x%x, resetting...\n",
>> > +               cause);
> right justify this and others as well please
> 

Can you please point me to other lines that need to be fixed please? It looks good
to me though it doesn't to you. I want to make sure that I'm touching the right ones.
You seem to prefer a tab following an open parenthesis in your code. Do you want me to
add a tab for every single multi-line such that it comes this for instance?


	ret = readl_poll_timeout(lldev->trca + HIDMA_TRCA_CTRLSTS_REG, val,
				 	HIDMA_CH_STATE(val) == HIDMA_CH_DISABLED, 
					1000, 10000); 

instead of

	ret = readl_poll_timeout(lldev->trca + HIDMA_TRCA_CTRLSTS_REG, val,
				 HIDMA_CH_STATE(val) == HIDMA_CH_DISABLED, 1000,
				 10000); 


>>>> > >> +int hidma_ll_resume(struct hidma_lldev *lldev)
>>>> > >> +{
>>>> > >> +	return hidma_ll_enable(lldev);
>>>> > >> +}
>>> > > 
>>> > > why do we need this empty function, use hidma_ll_enable.
>> > 
>> > hidma_ll_enable is a common function that gets called from multiple places. 
>> > hidma_ll_resume and hidma_ll_pause is used by the OS interface for pausing
>> > and resuming the DMA channel. 
> is there a reason why we can't have the code in resume and that being called
> internally as well as externally?
> 

I'll have the pause code in OS layer call hidma_ll_enable and get rid of pause
function here.

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project