linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 03:02:30 +0300
From:	Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:	Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sylvain Lemieux <slemieux.tyco@...il.com>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] MAINTAINERS: add new maintainers of NXP LPC32xx SoC

On 29.04.2016 02:14, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Friday 29 April 2016 02:10:32 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>> Hi Arnd,
>>
>> On 27.04.2016 12:39, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 27 April 2016 02:55:16 Vladimir Zapolskiy wrote:
>>>> Roland Stigge added initial support of NXP LPC32xx SoC series and
>>>> first boards powered by it, but for a while since v3.18-rc1 the
>>>> SoC support is unmaintained and became stale.
>>>>
>>>> Vladimir Zapolskiy and Sylvain Lemieux expressed interest in
>>>> continuation of NXP LPC32xx maintenance, reflect this in MAINTAINERS
>>>> record file for better communication with Linux kernel community.
>>>>
>>>> The maintenance change is in agreement with Arnd Bergmann:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Looks good. Let's give Roland some time to reply (hopefully with
>>> and Ack), and then merge it for 4.7.
>>>
>>
>> to simplify the matter and to legitimate the process somehow I decided
>> not to include this change of maintainers into my last LPC32xx SoC pull
>> request, hence the pull request contains only code changes.
>>
>> In other words please let me explicitly delegate a decision to you or
>> other ARM maintainers when and which way to apply this change. As for
>> me here I would prefer to get Signed-off-by tags from one of you.
>>
>> If I'm worried for nothing, or if you don't consider to pick these
>> changes up directly from linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, for
>> your convenience I'll send a pull request to arm@...nel.org.
> 
> It's all fine with me. My plan so far is to pick up the patches
> separately in a couple of days, but if you send a pull request,
> I'll take that instead. If Roland still wants to be listed in
> the MAINTAINERS file, we can change it again, but I'm considering
> the two of you the primary contacts now.
> 

Sounds good, I offload that anxiety from my mind then.

Thank you.

--
With best wishes,
Vladimir