linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 29 Apr 2016 17:45:12 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Yury Norov <ynorov@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
	pinskia@...il.com, Prasun.Kapoor@...iumnetworks.com,
	schwab@...e.de, broonie@...nel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	heiko.carstens@...ibm.com, agraf@...e.de, klimov.linux@...il.com,
	Andrew Pinski <Andrew.Pinski@...iumnetworks.com>,
	bamvor.zhangjian@...wei.com, Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>,
	schwidefsky@...ibm.com, Nathan_Lynch@...tor.com,
	joseph@...esourcery.com, christoph.muellner@...obroma-systems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/25] arm64:ilp32: add sys_ilp32.c and a separate table (in entry.S) to use it

On Friday 29 April 2016 16:13:38 Yury Norov wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:43:41AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Friday 29 April 2016 01:21:37 Yury Norov wrote:

> > > 
> > > arch/arm64/kernel/sys_ilp32.c:59:0: warning: "__SYSCALL" redefined
> > >  #define __SYSCALL(nr, sym) [nr] = sym,
> > >  ^
> > > In file included from include/asm-generic/unistd.h:1:0,
> > > 
> > 
> > Ok, I think I see it now. Can you #undef the two symbols at the
> > end of arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
> 
> I think it doesn't look better than what we have now, but not worse
> as well. If you like it, I'll change.

I looked again and saw that the existing architectures also #undef __SYSCALL,
and they don't have __SC_WRAP. It's probably fine to just #undef the
two here (don't undef SC_COMP, __SC_3264 and SC_COMP_3264).

Changing the asm-generic header to not require the #undef would be nice,
but then we should do that for all 12 users of that file.

	Arnd