lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 2 May 2016 11:12:11 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Florian Euchner <florian.euchner@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: CM109: Fix handling of volume and mute buttons

Hi Florian,

On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 09:23:17PM +0100, Florian Euchner wrote:
> The CM109 driver reported key press events of volume up / down and
> record / playback mute buttons, but release events only as soon as
> another button was pressed. Track state of volume buttons in order to
> report press and release events properly. For the record and playback
> mute buttons, only presses are registered by the CM109, therefore
> simulate press-n-release. This fixes the volume control buttons of
> various USB headsets.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Florian Euchner <florian.euchner@...il.com>
> ---
> 
> The CM109 datasheet states that bit 0 and 1 of HID_IR0 indicate if
> volume up / down have been pressed (1) or released (0). Bits 2 and 3
> indicate a press-n-release for playback / record mute, there is no way
> to determine when the mute buttons were released.
> 
> I contacted Alfred E. Heggestad, the original author of this driver,
> but he understandably couldn't comment on this issue as he didn't work
> with the CM109 for quite some time. I cannot test this patch with the
> original USB phones the CM109 driver was intended for, I don't own one of
> those and the CM109 ones (at least those mentioned in the driver) have
> become harder to obtain, but I'd be very surprised if this patch didn't
> also work with those.
> 
>  drivers/input/misc/cm109.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
>  1 file changed, 45 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c b/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c
> index 9365535..e2c1a80 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/cm109.c
> @@ -76,8 +76,8 @@ enum {
>  
>  	BUZZER_ON = 1 << 5,
>  
> -	/* up to 256 normal keys, up to 16 special keys */
> -	KEYMAP_SIZE = 256 + 16,
> +	/* up to 256 keys on the normal keymap */
> +	KEYMAP_SIZE = 256,

So we are breaking remapping of the "special" keys, why?

>  };
>  
>  /* CM109 protocol packet */
> @@ -129,25 +129,14 @@ struct cm109_dev {
>  	int key_code;		/* last reported key */
>  	int keybit;		/* 0=new scan  1,2,4,8=scan columns  */
>  	u8 gpi;			/* Cached value of GPI (high nibble) */
> +	bool volup_cached;	/* Cached state of volume up button */
> +	bool voldown_cached;	/* Cached state of volume down button */
>  };
>  
>  /******************************************************************************
>   * CM109 key interface
>   *****************************************************************************/
>  
> -static unsigned short special_keymap(int code)
> -{
> -	if (code > 0xff) {
> -		switch (code - 0xff) {
> -		case RECORD_MUTE:	return KEY_MUTE;
> -		case PLAYBACK_MUTE:	return KEY_MUTE;
> -		case VOLUME_DOWN:	return KEY_VOLUMEDOWN;
> -		case VOLUME_UP:		return KEY_VOLUMEUP;
> -		}
> -	}
> -	return KEY_RESERVED;
> -}
> -
>  /* Map device buttons to internal key events.
>   *
>   * The "up" and "down" keys, are symbolised by arrows on the button.
> @@ -191,7 +180,7 @@ static unsigned short keymap_kip1000(int scancode)
>  	case 0x48: return KEY_ESC;			/*   hangup     */
>  	case 0x28: return KEY_LEFT;			/*   IN         */
>  	case 0x18: return KEY_RIGHT;			/*   OUT        */
> -	default:   return special_keymap(scancode);
> +	default:   return KEY_RESERVED;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -224,7 +213,7 @@ static unsigned short keymap_gtalk(int scancode)
>  	case 0x28: return KEY_ESC;		/* End (red handset) */
>  	case 0x48: return KEY_UP;		/* Menu up (rocker switch) */
>  	case 0x88: return KEY_DOWN;		/* Menu down (rocker switch) */
> -	default:   return special_keymap(scancode);
> +	default:   return KEY_RESERVED;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -253,7 +242,7 @@ static unsigned short keymap_usbph01(int scancode)
>  	case 0x28: return KEY_ESC;			/*   hangup     */
>  	case 0x48: return KEY_LEFT;			/*   IN         */
>  	case 0x88: return KEY_RIGHT;			/*   OUT        */
> -	default:   return special_keymap(scancode);
> +	default:   return KEY_RESERVED;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -284,7 +273,7 @@ static unsigned short keymap_atcom(int scancode)
>  	case 0x28: return KEY_ESC;			/*   hangup     */
>  	case 0x48: return KEY_LEFT;			/* left arrow   */
>  	case 0x88: return KEY_RIGHT;			/* right arrow  */
> -	default:   return special_keymap(scancode);
> +	default:   return KEY_RESERVED;
>  	}
>  }
>  
> @@ -338,9 +327,13 @@ static void cm109_submit_buzz_toggle(struct cm109_dev *dev)
>  static void cm109_urb_irq_callback(struct urb *urb)
>  {
>  	struct cm109_dev *dev = urb->context;
> +	struct input_dev *idev = dev->idev;
>  	const int status = urb->status;
>  	int error;
>  
> +	bool volup_pressed = !!(dev->irq_data->byte[HID_IR0] & VOLUME_UP);
> +	bool voldown_pressed = !!(dev->irq_data->byte[HID_IR0] & VOLUME_DOWN);
> +
>  	dev_dbg(&dev->intf->dev, "### URB IRQ: [0x%02x 0x%02x 0x%02x 0x%02x] keybit=0x%02x\n",
>  	     dev->irq_data->byte[0],
>  	     dev->irq_data->byte[1],
> @@ -356,13 +349,35 @@ static void cm109_urb_irq_callback(struct urb *urb)
>  		goto out;
>  	}
>  
> -	/* Special keys */
> -	if (dev->irq_data->byte[HID_IR0] & 0x0f) {
> -		const int code = (dev->irq_data->byte[HID_IR0] & 0x0f);
> -		report_key(dev, dev->keymap[0xff + code]);
> +	/* Report volume up / down button changes */
> +	if (volup_pressed != dev->volup_cached) {
> +		input_report_key(idev, KEY_VOLUMEUP, volup_pressed);
> +		input_sync(idev);
> +		dev->volup_cached = volup_pressed;

I am not sure why we do this. Why can't we have:

static void cm109_report_special(struct cm109_dev *dev)
{
	static const u8 autorelease = RECORD_MUTE | PLAYBACK_MUTE;
	struct input_dev *idev = dev->idev;
	u8 data = dev->irq_data->byte[HID_IR0];
	unsigned short keycode;
	int i;

	for (i = 0; i < 8; i++) {
		keycode = dev->keymap[0xff + BIT(i)]);
		if (keycode == KEY_RESERVED)
			continue;

		input_report_key(idev, keycode, data & BIT(i));
		if (data & autorelease & BIT(i)) {
			input_sync(idev);
			input_report_key(idev, keycode, 0);
		}
	}
	input_sync(idev);
}

Thanks.

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ