linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen driver.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 6 May 2016 08:32:19 +0100
From:	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
To:	"majun (F)" <majun258@...wei.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Catalin.Marinas@....com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, Will.Deacon@....com,
	mark.rutland@....com, jason@...edaemon.net, lizefan@...wei.com,
	huxinwei@...wei.com, dingtianhong@...wei.com,
	liguozhu@...ilicon.com, guohanjun@...wei.com,
	zhaojunhua@...ilicon.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/2] irqchip/mbigen: fix the IO remap problem in mbigen
 driver.

On 06/05/16 02:12, majun (F) wrote:
> Hi Marc:
> 
> 在 2016/5/5 22:49, Marc Zyngier 写道:
>> On 22/03/16 03:10, majun (F) wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> 在 2016/3/21 18:29, Thomas Gleixner 写道:
>>>> On Thu, 17 Mar 2016, MaJun wrote:
>>>>> This patch set is used to fix the problem of remap a set of registers
>>>>> repeatedly in current mbigen driver.
>>>>>
>>>>>   irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen node definition in dt binding file
>>>>>   irqchip/mbigen:Change the mbigen driver based on the new mbigen node definition
>>>>
>>>> These subject lines are still horrible as they tell nothing about the nature
>>>> of the change. I fixed them up along with the changelogs and applied them to
>>>> irq/urgent. Can you spot the difference?
>>>
>>> Yes, after you changing, the subject and change log clearly show why we need to
>>> do this change.
>>> I have learned a lot from you :)
>>>
>>>>
>>>> While at it. The config switch for this driver is horrible. It's just in the
>>>> middle of the device driver configs. Why is this configurable by the user at
>>>> all? It simply should be selected by arm64 or some subarch configuration
>>>> there. Please clean that up.
>>>>
>>> will do.
>>
>> So what's the status of this? Do you still plan to respin it?
>>
> 
> This patch set had been ACK by Thomas.

Interesting. Somehow, the ARM email server has decided not to deliver
the tip-bot messages, so I didn't see it was already in.

Sorry for the noise.

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...