lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 12 May 2016 12:16:13 -0700
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To:	Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
Cc:	Bastien Nocera <hadess@...ess.net>, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input - ntrig_spi: add new driver for the Surface 3

Hi Benjamin,

On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 05:07:54PM +0200, Benjamin Tissoires wrote:
> This is a basic driver for the Surface 3. I am not so sure it will work
> with any firmwares as most values are encoded, but given that I only have
> access to my current device with its firmware and I don't have the
> datasheet, it should be OK for now.
> 
> The Surface Pen is not supported (if it is supposed to be). I'll work on
> this when I get one.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...hat.com>
> ---
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig     |  11 ++
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile    |   1 +
>  drivers/input/touchscreen/ntrig_spi.c | 339 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  3 files changed, 351 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 drivers/input/touchscreen/ntrig_spi.c
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> index 8ecdc38..22296a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Kconfig
> @@ -561,6 +561,17 @@ config TOUCHSCREEN_MK712
>  	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
>  	  module will be called mk712.
>  
> +config TOUCHSCREEN_NTRIG_SPI
> +	tristate "Ntrig/Microsoft SPI touchscreen"
> +	help
> +	  Say Y here if you have the Ntrig/Microsoft SPI touchscreen
> +	  controller chip as found on the Surface 3 in your system.
> +
> +	  If unsure, say N.
> +
> +	  To compile this driver as a module, choose M here: the
> +	  module will be called ntrig_spi.
> +
>  config TOUCHSCREEN_HP600
>  	tristate "HP Jornada 6xx touchscreen"
>  	depends on SH_HP6XX && SH_ADC
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> index f42975e..8e04ad1 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/Makefile
> @@ -54,6 +54,7 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MIGOR)		+= migor_ts.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MMS114)	+= mms114.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MTOUCH)	+= mtouch.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_MK712)		+= mk712.o
> +obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_NTRIG_SPI)	+= ntrig_spi.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_HP600)		+= hp680_ts_input.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_HP7XX)		+= jornada720_ts.o
>  obj-$(CONFIG_TOUCHSCREEN_IPAQ_MICRO)	+= ipaq-micro-ts.o
> diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen/ntrig_spi.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ntrig_spi.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0d61fc0
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen/ntrig_spi.c
> @@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
> +/*
> + *  Driver for Ntrig/Microsoft Touchscreens over SPI
> + *
> + *  Copyright (c) 2016 Red Hat Inc.
> + *
> + */
> +
> +/*
> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
> + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> + * Software Foundation; version 2 of the License.
> + */
> +
> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
> +
> +#include <asm/unaligned.h>
> +#include <linux/delay.h>
> +#include <linux/gpio/consumer.h>
> +#include <linux/input.h>
> +#include <linux/input/mt.h>
> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
> +#include <linux/module.h>
> +#include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> +#include <linux/acpi.h>
> +
> +#define NTRIG_PACKET_SIZE	264
> +
> +struct ntrig {
> +	struct spi_device *spi;
> +	struct gpio_desc *gpiod_int;
> +	struct gpio_desc *gpiod_rst[2];
> +	struct input_dev *input_dev;
> +};
> +
> +struct ntrig_finger {
> +	u8 status;
> +	u16 tracking_id;

Can we annotate it with __leXX/__beXX as needed to make sure we do not
accidentally use the structure directly.

> +	u16 x;
> +	u16 cx;
> +	u16 y;
> +	u16 cy;
> +	u16 width;
> +	u16 height;
> +	u32 padding;
> +} __packed;
> +
> +static ssize_t ntrig_spi_read(struct spi_device *spi, char *rxbuf, size_t len)
> +{
> +	struct spi_message msg;
> +	struct spi_transfer xfer;
> +	u8 rd_buf[NTRIG_PACKET_SIZE];
> +	int err = 0;
> +
> +	if (!spi)
> +		return 0;

How?

> +
> +	memset(&xfer, 0, sizeof(xfer));
> +	memset(rd_buf, 0, sizeof(rd_buf));
> +	spi_message_init(&msg);
> +
> +	xfer.tx_buf = NULL;
> +	xfer.len = len;
> +	xfer.rx_buf = rd_buf;

SPI (like USB) required buffers to be DMA-able, so they can not be on
stack. Either allocate with kmalloc or put as __cacheline__aligned in
ntrig structure.

> +	spi_message_add_tail(&xfer, &msg);
> +
> +	err = spi_sync(spi, &msg);
> +	memcpy(rxbuf, rd_buf, xfer.len);

BTW, why exactly we use local buffer? And why not simply use spi_read()?

> +
> +	return err;
> +}
> +
> +static void ntrig_spi_report_touch(struct ntrig *ntr,
> +				   struct ntrig_finger *finger)
> +{
> +	int st = finger->status & 0x01;
> +	int id = get_unaligned_le16(&finger->tracking_id);
> +	int  x = get_unaligned_le16(&finger->x);
> +	int  y = get_unaligned_le16(&finger->y);
> +	int  w = get_unaligned_le16(&finger->width);
> +	int  h = get_unaligned_le16(&finger->height);
> +	int slot;
> +
> +	slot = input_mt_get_slot_by_key(ntr->input_dev, id);
> +	if (slot < 0)
> +		return;
> +
> +	input_mt_slot(ntr->input_dev, slot);
> +	input_mt_report_slot_state(ntr->input_dev, MT_TOOL_FINGER, st);
> +	if (st) {

Maybe do the le->cpu conversions only when we have active touch?

> +		input_report_abs(ntr->input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, x);
> +		input_report_abs(ntr->input_dev, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, y);
> +		input_report_abs(ntr->input_dev, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MAJOR, w);
> +		input_report_abs(ntr->input_dev, ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR, w);
> +		input_report_abs(ntr->input_dev, ABS_MT_TOUCH_MINOR, h);
> +		input_report_abs(ntr->input_dev, ABS_MT_WIDTH_MINOR, h);

Do we need to report WIDTH if it is same as TOUCH? BTW, you do not seem
to declare TOUCH in input devoice capabilities.

> +	}
> +}
> +
> +static int ntrig_spi_process(struct ntrig *ntr, const char *data)
> +{
> +	const char header[] = {0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xff, 0xa5, 0x5a, 0xe7, 0x7e,
> +			       0x01, 0xd2, 0x00, 0x80, 0x01, 0x03, 0x03};
> +	u16 timestamp;
> +	unsigned int i;
> +
> +	if (memcmp(header, data, sizeof(header)))
> +		dev_err(&ntr->spi->dev, "%s header error: %15ph, ignoring... %s:%d\n",

Use %*ph and then (int)sizeof(header) ?

> +			__func__, data, __FILE__, __LINE__);

Do we really need FILE/LINE?

> +
> +	timestamp = get_unaligned_le16(&data[15]);
> +
> +	for (i = 0; i < 13; i++) {
> +		struct ntrig_finger *finger;
> +
> +		finger = (struct ntrig_finger *)&data[17 +
> +					       i * sizeof(struct ntrig_finger)];
> +
> +		if (finger->status & 0x10)
> +			break;

Comment why we are breaking out?

> +
> +		ntrig_spi_report_touch(ntr, finger);
> +	}
> +
> +	input_mt_sync_frame(ntr->input_dev);
> +	input_sync(ntr->input_dev);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static irqreturn_t ntrig_spi_irq_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
> +{
> +	struct ntrig *data = dev_id;
> +	char spiRxbuf[NTRIG_PACKET_SIZE];
> +
> +	while (gpiod_get_value(data->gpiod_int)) {

What if interrupt line is not described as GPIO?

> +		memset(spiRxbuf, 0x00, NTRIG_PACKET_SIZE);

No camel casing (or local buffers either).

> +		ntrig_spi_read(data->spi, spiRxbuf, NTRIG_PACKET_SIZE);

Handle failures?

> +		dev_dbg(&data->spi->dev, "%s received -> %*ph %s:%d\n",
> +			__func__, NTRIG_PACKET_SIZE, spiRxbuf,
> +			__FILE__, __LINE__);
> +		ntrig_spi_process(data, spiRxbuf);
> +	}
> +
> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
> +}
> +
> +static void ntrig_spi_power(struct ntrig *data, unsigned int value)

"bool on"?

> +{
> +	gpiod_set_value(data->gpiod_rst[0], value);
> +	gpiod_set_value(data->gpiod_rst[1], value);

Does it require any timing considerations?

> +}
> +
> +/**
> + * ntrig_spi_get_gpio_config - Get GPIO config from ACPI/DT
> + *
> + * @ts: ntrig_spi_ts_data pointer
> + */
> +static int ntrig_spi_get_gpio_config(struct ntrig *data)
> +{
> +	int error;
> +	struct device *dev;
> +	struct gpio_desc *gpiod;
> +	int i;
> +
> +	if (!data->spi)
> +		return -EINVAL;

How?

> +
> +	dev = &data->spi->dev;
> +
> +	/* Get the interrupt GPIO pin number */
> +	gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, 2, GPIOD_IN);
> +	if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> +		error = PTR_ERR(gpiod);
> +		if (error != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +			dev_err(dev, "Failed to get int GPIO: %d\n", error);
> +		return error;
> +	}

Can this made optional?

> +
> +	data->gpiod_int = gpiod;
> +
> +	/* Get the reset lines GPIO pin number */
> +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> +		gpiod = devm_gpiod_get_index(dev, NULL, i, GPIOD_OUT_LOW);
> +		if (IS_ERR(gpiod)) {
> +			error = PTR_ERR(gpiod);
> +			if (error != -EPROBE_DEFER)
> +				dev_err(dev,
> +					"Failed to get power GPIO %d: %d\n",
> +					i,
> +					error);
> +			return error;
> +		}
> +
> +		data->gpiod_rst[i] = gpiod;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int ntrig_spi_create_input(struct ntrig *data)
> +{
> +	struct input_dev *input;
> +	int error;
> +
> +	input = devm_input_allocate_device(&data->spi->dev);
> +	if (IS_ERR(input))
> +		return PTR_ERR(input);

devm_input_allocate_device does not return ERR_PTR-encoded pointers.

> +
> +	data->input_dev = input;
> +
> +	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, 0, 9600, 0, 0);
> +	input_abs_set_res(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_X, 40);
> +	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, 0, 7200, 0, 0);
> +	input_abs_set_res(input, ABS_MT_POSITION_Y, 48);
> +	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_WIDTH_MAJOR, 0, 1024, 0, 0);
> +	input_set_abs_params(input, ABS_MT_WIDTH_MINOR, 0, 1024, 0, 0);
> +	input_mt_init_slots(input, 10, INPUT_MT_DIRECT);
> +
> +	input->name = "Ntrig Capacitive TouchScreen";
> +	input->phys = "input/ts";
> +	input->id.bustype = BUS_SPI;
> +	input->id.vendor = 0x1b96;
> +	input->id.product = 0x0000;
> +	input->id.version = 0x0000;
> +
> +	error = input_register_device(input);
> +	if (error) {
> +		dev_err(&data->spi->dev,
> +			"Failed to register input device: %d", error);
> +		return error;
> +	}
> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static void ntrig_spi_free_irq(struct ntrig *data)
> +{
> +	devm_free_irq(&data->spi->dev, data->spi->irq, data);
> +}
> +
> +static int ntrig_spi_request_irq(struct ntrig *data)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = data->spi;
> +
> +	return devm_request_threaded_irq(&spi->dev, spi->irq,
> +					  NULL, ntrig_spi_irq_handler,
> +					  IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_RISING | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +					  "Ntrig-irq", data);
> +}
> +
> +static int ntrig_spi_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
> +{
> +	struct ntrig *data = NULL;

Why do you initialize this?

> +	int error;
> +
> +	/* Set up SPI*/
> +	spi->bits_per_word = 8;
> +	spi->mode = SPI_MODE_0;
> +	error = spi_setup(spi);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	data = devm_kzalloc(&spi->dev, sizeof(*data), GFP_KERNEL);

Error handling?

> +
> +	data->spi = spi;
> +	spi_set_drvdata(spi, data);
> +
> +	error = ntrig_spi_get_gpio_config(data);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	ntrig_spi_power(data, 1);
> +	msleep(20);
> +	ntrig_spi_power(data, 0);
> +	msleep(20);
> +	ntrig_spi_power(data, 1);
> +
> +	error = ntrig_spi_create_input(data);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	error = ntrig_spi_request_irq(data);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;
> +
> +	return PTR_ERR_OR_ZERO(data);

Why on earth???

> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused ntrig_spi_suspend(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ntrig *data = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> +
> +	ntrig_spi_free_irq(data);

Why?

> +
> +	ntrig_spi_power(data, 0);

false?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int __maybe_unused ntrig_spi_resume(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct spi_device *spi = to_spi_device(dev);
> +	struct ntrig *data = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
> +	int error;
> +
> +	ntrig_spi_power(data, 1);

true?

> +
> +	error = ntrig_spi_request_irq(data);
> +	if (error)
> +		return error;

Again, why?

> +
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static SIMPLE_DEV_PM_OPS(ntrig_spi_pm_ops, ntrig_spi_suspend, ntrig_spi_resume);
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI
> +static const struct acpi_device_id ntrig_spi_acpi_match[] = {
> +	{ "MSHW0037", 0 },
> +	{ }
> +};
> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, ntrig_spi_acpi_match);
> +#endif
> +
> +static struct spi_driver ntrig_spi_driver = {
> +	.driver = {
> +		.name	= "Ntrig-spi",
> +		.acpi_match_table = ACPI_PTR(ntrig_spi_acpi_match),
> +		.pm = &ntrig_spi_pm_ops,
> +	},
> +	.probe = ntrig_spi_probe,
> +};
> +
> +module_spi_driver(ntrig_spi_driver);
> +
> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@...il.com>");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Ntrig SPI touchscreen driver");
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> -- 
> 2.5.0
> 

-- 
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ