linux-kernel - Re: mfd: twl-core: Return directly after a failed platform_device_alloc() in add_numbered

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 07:00:59 +0100
From:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Cc:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: mfd: twl-core: Return directly after a failed
 platform_device_alloc() in add_numbered_child()

On Mon, 16 May 2016, Julia Lawall wrote:

> On Mon, 16 May 2016, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> 
> > >> * Change an error message.
> > > 
> > > Why?  Is dev_err needed?
> > 
> > I interpreted Lee's response in this way.
> > https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/11/104
> 
> OK.  He didn't ask for the message to be changed though.  It's a bit 
> unfortunate that it now takes up multiple lines.  And I believe it also 
> prints redundant information.  Perhaps he will have some further thoughts 
> on the matter.

Yes, Julia is right.  We normally don't print anything for OOM
errors since Linux reports on them already.

Please remove the print altogether.

-- 
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog