lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 17 May 2016 10:27:12 +0900
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 08/12] zsmalloc: introduce zspage structure

On (05/17/16 10:14), Minchan Kim wrote:
[..]
> > can we also switch create_cache() to errnos? I just like a bit
> > better
> > 		return -ENOMEM;
> > 	else
> > 		return 0;
> > 
> > than
> > 
> > 		return 1;
> > 	else
> > 		return 0;
> > 
> 
> Hmm, of course, I can do it easily.
> But zs_create_pool returns NULL without error propagation from sub
> functions so I don't see any gain from returning errno from
> create_cache. I don't mean I hate it but just need a justificaion
> to persuade grumpy me.

:) not married to those errnos. can skip it.

> > > +static struct zspage *isolate_zspage(struct size_class *class, bool source)
> > >  {
> > > +	struct zspage *zspage;
> > > +	enum fullness_group fg[2] = {ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY, ZS_ALMOST_FULL};
> > > +	if (!source) {
> > > +		fg[0] = ZS_ALMOST_FULL;
> > > +		fg[1] = ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY;
> > > +	}
> > > +
> > > +	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
> > 
> > sorry, why not "for (i = ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY; i <= ZS_ALMOST_FULL ..." ?
> 
> For source zspage, the policy is to find a fragment object from ZS_ALMOST_EMPTY.
> For target zspage, the policy is to find a fragment object from ZS_ALMOST_FULL.
> 
> Do I misunderstand your question?

ahhh... sorry, it's just me being silly. I got it now.

	-ss

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ