linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] rcutorture: Several fixes to run selftest scripts on PPC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 18 May 2016 21:25:17 -0700
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] rcutorture: Several fixes to run selftest scripts on
 PPC

On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:42:20AM +0800, Boqun Feng wrote:
> I spend some time to make tools/testing/selftest/rcutorture run on PPC,
> here are some documention and fixes made while I was trying.
> 
> The scripts are able to run and get results on PPC, however please
> note there are some stalls even build errors that could be found
> by the tests currently.
> 
> As I'm certainly not an expert of qemu or bash programming, there
> may be something I am missing in those patches. So tests and comments
> are welcome ;-)
> 
> Regards,
> Boqun
> 
> Boqun Feng (4):
>   rcutorture/doc: Add a new way to create initrd using dracut
>   rcutorture: Use vmlinux as the fallback kernel image
>   rcutorture: Make -soundhw a x86 specific option
>   rcutorture: Don't specify the cpu type of QEMU on PPC

All four of these seem reasonable to me:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>

I responded to the -soundhw patch, trying to track down why that option
was needed in the first place, and seeking a solution that doesn't
require adding to the set of target-specific options.  But I don't think
that investigation should block your fix.