lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 17:34:15 -0700
From:	Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@...eyko.com>
To:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
Cc:	Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Vyacheslav.Dubeyko@...t.com, Cyril.Guyot@...t.com,
	Adam.Manzanares@...t.com, Damien.LeMoal@...t.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] f2fs: introduce on-disk layout version checking
 functionality

On Tue, 2016-05-24 at 01:53 -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:

[snipped]
> 
> That goes on to the next question: why do we even need a config option
> for 16TB+ volume support?
> 

I believe that it makes sense to have config option during
implementation phase. I mean that it needs to protect this experimental
"feature" from being using till finally stabilized functionality. Then
the config option could be deleted if we haven't necessity in this
option.

Thanks,
Vyacheslav Dubeyko.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ