linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hwrng: stm32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 25 May 2016 07:30:09 +0530
From:	Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To:	Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>,
	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hwrng: stm32 - fix build warning

On Tuesday 24 May 2016 02:50 PM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 2016-05-24 10:58 GMT+02:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>> On Tuesday, May 24, 2016 10:50:17 AM CEST Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>> diff --git a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
>>> b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
>>> index 92a810648bd0..2a0fc90e4dc3 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/char/hw_random/stm32-rng.c
>>> @@ -68,6 +68,10 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void
>>> *data, size_t max, bool wait)
>>>                          } while (!sr && --timeout);
>>>                  }
>>>
>>> +               if (WARN_ONCE(sr & (RNG_SR_SEIS | RNG_SR_CEIS),
>>> +                               "bad RNG status - %x\n", sr))
>>> +                       writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + RNG_SR);
>>> +
>>>                  /* If error detected or data not ready... */
>>>                  if (sr != RNG_SR_DRDY)
>>>                          break;
>>> @@ -79,10 +83,6 @@ static int stm32_rng_read(struct hwrng *rng, void
>>> *data, size_t max, bool wait)
>>>                  max -= sizeof(u32);
>>>          }
>>>
>>> -       if (WARN_ONCE(sr & (RNG_SR_SEIS | RNG_SR_CEIS),
>>> -                     "bad RNG status - %x\n", sr))
>>> -               writel_relaxed(0, priv->base + RNG_SR);
>>> -
>>>          pm_runtime_mark_last_busy((struct device *) priv->rng.priv);
>>>          pm_runtime_put_sync_autosuspend((struct device *) priv->rng.priv);
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>
>> Yes, that looks good to me.
>
> Thanks!
> Sudip, do you want to send the patch, or I manage to do it?

Maybe you should send it, i have not done anything in reaching its final 
form.

Regards
Sudip