linux-kernel - [PATCH 06/24] staging: unisys: visorbus: removed unused periodic_test

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 24 May 2016 23:45:44 -0400
From:	David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>
To:	<corbet@....net>, <tglx@...utronix.de>, <mingo@...hat.com>,
	<hpa@...or.com>, <david.kershner@...sys.com>,
	<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, <erik.arfvidson@...sys.com>,
	<timothy.sell@...sys.com>, <hofrat@...dl.org>,
	<dzickus@...hat.com>, <jes.sorensen@...hat.com>,
	<alexander.curtin@...sys.com>, <janani.rvchndrn@...il.com>,
	<sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>, <prarit@...hat.com>,
	<david.binder@...sys.com>, <nhorman@...hat.com>,
	<dan.j.williams@...el.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
	<driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	<sparmaintainer@...sys.com>
CC:	Tim Sell <Timothy.Sell@...sys.com>
Subject: [PATCH 06/24] staging: unisys: visorbus: removed unused periodic_test_workqueue

From: Tim Sell <Timothy.Sell@...sys.com>

periodic_test_workqueue was an unused relic from the past, and was removed.

Signed-off-by: Tim Sell <Timothy.Sell@...sys.com>
Signed-off-by: David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>
---
 drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c | 15 ---------------
 1 file changed, 15 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
index c30b4b2..608ca1a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/unisys/visorbus/visorbus_main.c
@@ -116,14 +116,6 @@ struct bus_type visorbus_type = {
 	.bus_groups = visorbus_bus_groups,
 };
 
-static struct delayed_work periodic_work;
-
-/* YES, we need 2 workqueues.
- * The reason is, workitems on the test queue may need to cancel
- * workitems on the other queue.  You will be in for trouble if you try to
- * do this with workitems queued on the same workqueue.
- */
-static struct workqueue_struct *periodic_test_workqueue;
 static struct workqueue_struct *periodic_dev_workqueue;
 static long long bus_count;	/** number of bus instances */
 					/** ever-increasing */
@@ -1306,13 +1298,6 @@ visorbus_exit(void)
 	destroy_workqueue(periodic_dev_workqueue);
 	periodic_dev_workqueue = NULL;
 
-	if (periodic_test_workqueue) {
-		cancel_delayed_work(&periodic_work);
-		flush_workqueue(periodic_test_workqueue);
-		destroy_workqueue(periodic_test_workqueue);
-		periodic_test_workqueue = NULL;
-	}
-
 	list_for_each_safe(listentry, listtmp, &list_all_bus_instances) {
 		struct visor_device *dev = list_entry(listentry,
 						      struct visor_device,
-- 
1.9.1