linux-kernel - Re: [RFC v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: add *driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 27 May 2016 15:31:53 +0800
From:	YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
To:	CK Hu <ck.hu@...iatek.com>
CC:	<dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
	Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	"Matthias Brugger" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
	Mao Huang <littlecvr@...omium.org>,
	"Bibby Hsieh" <bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<srv_heupstream@...iatek.com>,
	"Sascha Hauer" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
	<yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com>, <emil.l.velikov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 3/5] drm/mediatek: add *driver_data for different
 hardware settings

Hi CK,


On Mon, 2016-05-23 at 17:43 +0800, CK Hu wrote:
> Hi, YT:
> 
> One comment below.
> 
> On Fri, 2016-05-20 at 23:05 +0800, yt.shen@...iatek.com wrote:
> > From: YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
> > 
> > There are some hardware settings changed, between MT8173 & MT2701:
> > DISP_OVL address offset changed, color format definition changed.
> > DISP_RDMA fifo size changed.
> > DISP_COLOR offset changed.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: YT Shen <yt.shen@...iatek.com>
> > ---
> > +
> > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_ovl_get_driver_data(
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > +		of_match_device(mtk_disp_ovl_driver_dt_match, &pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_rdma_get_driver_data(
> > +	struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > +		of_match_device(mtk_disp_rdma_driver_dt_match, &pdev->dev);
> > +
> > +	return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static inline struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *mtk_color_get_driver_data(
> > +	struct device_node *node)
> > +{
> > +	const struct of_device_id *of_id =
> > +		of_match_node(mtk_disp_color_driver_dt_match, node);
> > +
> > +	return (struct mtk_ddp_comp_driver_data *)of_id->data;
> > +}
> > + 
> 
> These three functions looks the same with different parameter:
> mtk_disp_ovl_driver_dt_match, mtk_disp_rdma_driver_dt_match, and
> mtk_disp_color_driver_dt_match. So merge them to prevent duplicated
> code.
OK, I'll do this in the next version.
> 
> Regards,
> CK
> 
>