linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus number.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 28 May 2016 22:57:33 +0200
From:	Christer Weinigel <christer@...nigel.se>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>
Cc:	Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] devicetree - document using aliases to set spi bus
 number.

On 05/27/2016 08:36 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> Personally the way I parse this situation is that the kernel is taking 
> a look at what's in the DT and making an effort to present it usefully 
> in the running systems. Fixing our current interpretation in stone as 
> a supported thing when we don't have to makes it more cumbersome to 
> improve and discourages any efforts to do similar things in the 
> future. It is reasonable to provide and document something here but 
> when there's some fairly simple and obvious better things we could be 
> doing it should be those rather than the legacy stuff. 

So what are the "simple and obvious better things" that one can use instead?

   /Christer

-- 
Have laptop, will travel.  I'm a consultant looking for interesting
jobs anywhere in the world.  I'm an experienced software engineer with
a solid understanding of hardware.  Specialities: Linux, device
drivers and embedded systems in general.  Find me at www.weinigel.se.