linux-kernel - Re: [2/3] hwmon: xgene: Adds hwmon driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 1 Jun 2016 11:10:49 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Hoan Tran <hotran@....com>
Cc:	Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@...aro.org>,
	Duc Dang <dhdang@....com>, Loc Ho <lho@....com>,
	linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2/3] hwmon: xgene: Adds hwmon driver

On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 11:00:05PM -0700, Hoan Tran wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
> 
> >
> > Overall, I have to say that the code is quite complex due to the repeated
> > checks for ACPI. I am close to suggest having two separate drivers,
> > one for ACPI and one for non-ACPI. Any chance to separate ACPI vs. non-ACPI
> > code a bit better ?
> 
> How about create separate rx_cb functions for ACPI and non-ACPI ?

Yes, that would be great if it is possible.

> As almost functions are the same between ACPI and non-ACPI, I thought
> keep the same driver is still OK, isn't it ?
> 
If you can separate the ACPI code from the non-ACPI code a bit better than
right now, yes.

Thanks,
Guenter