linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH resend v2 1/6] regulator: axp20x: support AXP809 variant

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 2 Jun 2016 14:25:36 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Cc:	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH resend v2 1/6] regulator: axp20x: support AXP809 variant

On Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 07:05:22PM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 6:27 PM, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> wrote:

> >> The mfd patches this one depended on were pushed around a week before
> >> the merge window, about a month after you reviewed, merged, then backed
> >> out this patch. There was no immutable branch either.

> > Why did it get backed out?

> Because of missing compile dependencies on the mfd bits, which weren't
> merged yet.

No, what I'm asking is why didn't it get merge along with the MFD bits?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)