[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2016 10:11:25 +0200
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Z Lim <zlim.lnx@...il.com>
CC: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>, kbuild-all@...org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Yang Shi <yang.shi@...aro.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/3] arm64: bpf: implement bpf_tail_call() helper
On 06/06/2016 06:56 AM, Z Lim wrote:
[...]
> How about the attached patch? Fixes compilation error on build
> !CONFIG_BPF_SYSCALL.
>
> Also, should this patch be sent to net or net-next (along with this series)?
Looks good, feel free to add:
Acked-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
I think net-next along with your series should be fine since the issue
first appeared there. Thanks, Zi!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists