[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 10:52:48 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch rfc] work-simple: Rename work-simple.[ch] to swork.[ch]
for consistency
On 06/05/2016 08:16 AM, Mike Galbraith wrote:
>
> The internal bits are already swork_blah, rename source to match.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>
I don't mind the rename to keep things consistent. I merged the rename
into the original patch.
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists