linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V5 7/9] irqchip/gic: Prepare for adding platform driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 13:39:43 +0100
From:	Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
	Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>
CC:	Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	"Mark Rutland" <mark.rutland@....com>,
	Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
	Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
	Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...nel.org>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
	"Linus Walleij" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
	<linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V5 7/9] irqchip/gic: Prepare for adding platform driver


On 06/06/16 12:53, Jon Hunter wrote:
> To support GICs that require runtime power management, it is necessary
> to add a platform driver, so that the probing of the chip can be
> deferred if resources, such as a power-domain, is not yet available.
> 
> To prepare for adding a platform driver:
>  1. Drop the __init section from the gic_dist_config() so this can be
>     re-used by the platform driver.
>  2. Add prototypes for functions required by the platform driver to the
>     GIC header file so they can be re-used.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c |  4 ++--
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c        | 15 ++++++++-------
>  include/linux/irqchip/arm-gic.h  |  5 +++++
>  3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c
> index 89e7423f0ebb..9ae71804b5dd 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic-common.c
> @@ -90,8 +90,8 @@ int gic_configure_irq(unsigned int irq, unsigned int type,
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> -void __init gic_dist_config(void __iomem *base, int gic_irqs,
> -			    void (*sync_access)(void))
> +void gic_dist_config(void __iomem *base, int gic_irqs,
> +		     void (*sync_access)(void))
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 94eab6e23124..3d3ab9045244 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -449,7 +449,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_if_up(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  }
>  
>  
> -static void __init gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +static void gic_dist_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	unsigned int i;
>  	u32 cpumask;
> @@ -535,7 +535,7 @@ int gic_cpu_if_down(unsigned int gic_nr)
>   * this function, no interrupts will be delivered by the GIC, and another
>   * platform-specific wakeup source must be enabled.
>   */
> -static void gic_dist_save(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +void gic_dist_save(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	unsigned int gic_irqs;
>  	void __iomem *dist_base;
> @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ static void gic_dist_save(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>   * handled normally, but any edge interrupts that occured will not be seen by
>   * the GIC and need to be handled by the platform-specific wakeup source.
>   */
> -static void gic_dist_restore(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +void gic_dist_restore(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	unsigned int gic_irqs;
>  	unsigned int i;
> @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ static void gic_dist_restore(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  	writel_relaxed(GICD_ENABLE, dist_base + GIC_DIST_CTRL);
>  }
>  
> -static void gic_cpu_save(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +void gic_cpu_save(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	u32 *ptr;
> @@ -650,7 +650,7 @@ static void gic_cpu_save(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  
>  }
>  
> -static void gic_cpu_restore(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +void gic_cpu_restore(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	int i;
>  	u32 *ptr;
> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static struct notifier_block gic_notifier_block = {
>  	.notifier_call = gic_notifier,
>  };
>  
> -static int __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +static int gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	gic->saved_ppi_enable = __alloc_percpu(DIV_ROUND_UP(32, 32) * 4,
>  		sizeof(u32));
> @@ -757,7 +757,7 @@ free_ppi_enable:
>  	return -ENOMEM;
>  }
>  #else
> -static int __init gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> +static int gic_pm_init(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
>  {
>  	return 0;
>  }
> @@ -1179,6 +1179,7 @@ static int __init __gic_init_bases(struct gic_chip_data *gic,
>  		set_smp_cross_call(gic_raise_softirq);
>  		register_cpu_notifier(&gic_cpu_notifier);
>  #endif
> +

Not sure where this extra line came from but shouldn't be here.

Marc let me know if you want me to resend.

Jon

-- 
nvpublic