[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 16:27:43 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...eblueprint.co.uk>,
Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@...el.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Benjamin Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] sched/fair: Clean up attach_entity_load_avg()
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:40:18PM +0200, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> > What about when tasks are moved between groups on CONFIG_SMP=n ?
> > Doesn't this change fail to age the load in that case?
>
> The load average stuff is only enable for SMP system but it's not used
> for UP system.
> To be honest, I don't know why
We'll likely change that 'soon', because the cpufreq_schedutil thing
also needs these numbers on UP.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists