linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 7 Jun 2016 11:25:27 +0300
From:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...ux.intel.com>,
	Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@...ux.intel.com>,
	Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.com>,
	Rajaram R <rajaram.officemail@...il.com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCHv2] usb: USB Type-C Connector Class

On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:41:28AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 04:45:09PM +0300, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> > > For consistency, should this be either type-c/type-c.c or
> > > typec/typec.c?
> > 
> > For some reason I like to have the dash in the folder name, but I
> > don't like the idea that the port driver would be in form
> > type-c_something. I would prefer them to be named typec_something. Or
> > maybe just "something" and also name the typec.c maybe class.c or
> > core.c.
> > 
> > Is this a big problem? I guess we could just name the folder "typec".
> > Guenter, whats your opinion?
> 
> "typec" please.

OK, typec it is.


Thanks,

-- 
heikki