linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 6 Jun 2016 21:30:11 -0700
From:	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.10 000/143] 3.10.102-stable review

Hi Willy,

On 06/06/2016 09:09 PM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Guenter,
>
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 08:46:57PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 12:18:23PM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at :
>>>     https://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/stable-review/patch-3.10.102-rc1.gz
>>>
>>
>> Hi Willy,
>>
>> my auto-builder can not pick up a stable release candidate from a
>> tarball like this.
>
> I guess you mean from a patch, since it's a patch and not a tarball :-)
>

Whatever it is :-)

>> Do you have a repository, either with the patch
>> series or with the to-be-tested branch, where the builder could
>> pick it up ?
>
> I don't but I can set something up for you. Would you be OK with a
> branch in my account (eg: "3.10-for-guenter") which I "git push -f"
> from my local branch ? That way you always pull from the same branch
> and we don't care if patches are removed during the process. Just let
> me know. Otherwise let me know if a different form is desired.
>

Yes, that would be excellent. I would suggest to name it something like
stable-3.10-queue, though, to be a bit more generic. After all, other
testers will want to pick it up as well.

Thanks,
Guenter