linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/3] x86, signals: add missing signal

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 08 Jun 2016 10:25:33 -0700
From:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	x86@...nel.org, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>,
	dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, tony.luck@...el.com, bp@...en8.de,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, luto@...nel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] x86, signals: add missing signal_compat code for x86 features


From: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>

The 32-bit siginfo is a different binary format than the 64-bit
one.  So, when running 32-bit binaries on 64-bit kernels, we have
to convert the kernel's 64-bit version to a 32-bit version that
userspace can grok.

We've added a few features to siginfo over the past few years and
neglected to add them to arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c:

   1. The si_addr_lsb used in SIGBUS's sent for machine checks
   2. The upper/lower bounds for MPX SIGSEGV faults
   3. The protection key for pkey faults

I caught this with some protection keys unit tests and realized
it affected a few more features.

This was tested only with my protection keys patch that looks
for a proper value in si_pkey.  I didn't actually test the machine
check or MPX code.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Cc: x86@...nel.org
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>
---

 b/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h   |   11 +++++++++++
 b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
 2 files changed, 26 insertions(+)

diff -puN arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h~add-signal-compat-for-mpx-pkeys arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h~add-signal-compat-for-mpx-pkeys	2016-06-08 10:23:23.559472773 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/compat.h	2016-06-08 10:23:23.564472998 -0700
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ typedef s32		compat_long_t;
 typedef s64 __attribute__((aligned(4))) compat_s64;
 typedef u32		compat_uint_t;
 typedef u32		compat_ulong_t;
+typedef u32		compat_u32;
 typedef u64 __attribute__((aligned(4))) compat_u64;
 typedef u32		compat_uptr_t;
 
@@ -181,6 +182,16 @@ typedef struct compat_siginfo {
 		/* SIGILL, SIGFPE, SIGSEGV, SIGBUS */
 		struct {
 			unsigned int _addr;	/* faulting insn/memory ref. */
+			short int _addr_lsb;	/* Valid LSB of the reported address. */
+			union {
+				/* used when si_code=SEGV_BNDERR */
+				struct {
+					compat_uptr_t _lower;
+					compat_uptr_t _upper;
+				} _addr_bnd;
+				/* used when si_code=SEGV_PKUERR */
+				compat_u32 _pkey;
+			};
 		} _sigfault;
 
 		/* SIGPOLL */
diff -puN arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c~add-signal-compat-for-mpx-pkeys arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c~add-signal-compat-for-mpx-pkeys	2016-06-08 10:23:23.561472863 -0700
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/signal_compat.c	2016-06-08 10:23:23.565473043 -0700
@@ -32,6 +32,21 @@ int copy_siginfo_to_user32(compat_siginf
 					  &to->_sifields._pad[0]);
 			switch (from->si_code >> 16) {
 			case __SI_FAULT >> 16:
+				if (from->si_signo == SIGBUS &&
+				    (from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AR ||
+				     from->si_code == BUS_MCEERR_AO))
+					put_user_ex(from->si_addr_lsb, &to->si_addr_lsb);
+
+				if (from->si_signo == SIGSEGV) {
+					if (from->si_code == SEGV_BNDERR) {
+						compat_uptr_t lower = (unsigned long)&to->si_lower;
+						compat_uptr_t upper = (unsigned long)&to->si_upper;
+						put_user_ex(lower, &to->si_lower);
+						put_user_ex(upper, &to->si_upper);
+					}
+					if (from->si_code == SEGV_PKUERR)
+						put_user_ex(from->si_pkey, &to->si_pkey);
+				}
 				break;
 			case __SI_SYS >> 16:
 				put_user_ex(from->si_syscall, &to->si_syscall);
_