linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for missing documentation and header files

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 8 Jun 2016 18:44:18 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	"Opensource [Steve Twiss]" <stwiss.opensource@...semi.com>
Cc:	LINUXKERNEL <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Support Opensource <Support.Opensource@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] MAINTAINERS: Add Dialog PMIC search terms for missing
 documentation and header files

On Wed, Jun 08, 2016 at 05:25:30PM +0000, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:
> On 08 June 2016 15:19, Mark Brown wrote:

> > We *really* shouldn't be blocking on my ack for trivial changes outside
> > the subsystem like this though :(

> There had been no reply since my first e-mail round about a month ago, so I
> figured there was something wrong with the patch submission.

It was the activity pattern on the patch more than anything else, and of
course the merge window was in that month as well.

> In future I will split up the responsibility and define the Subject line better to
> remove any ambiguity.

Like I say a trivial maintainers update like this really should just get
applied anyway.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (474 bytes)