lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 10 Jun 2016 13:23:50 +0100
From:	Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To:	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@...ovan.org>
Cc:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, marcheu@...gle.com,
	Daniel Stone <daniels@...labora.com>, seanpaul@...gle.com,
	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com,
	Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>,
	John Harrison <John.C.Harrison@...el.com>, m.chehab@...sung.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] dma-buf/sync_file: add sync_file_get_fence()

On Thu, Jun 09, 2016 at 12:05:29PM -0300, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
> From: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@...labora.co.uk>
> 
> Creates a function that given an sync file descriptor returns a
> fence_collection containing all fences in the sync_file.
> 
> If there is only one fence in the sync_file this fence itself is returned,
> however if there is more than one, a fence_collection fence is returned.
> 
> v2: Comments by Daniel Vetter
> 	- Adapt to new version of fence_collection_init()
> 	- Hold a reference for the fence we return
> 
> v3:     - Adapt to use fput() directly
> 	- rename to sync_file_get_fence() as we always return one fence
> 
> v4: Adapt to use fence_array

The sync_file looks just like a fence_array plus struct file integration.
Is there a good reason why we cannot just use fence_array here?
-Chris

-- 
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ