linux-kernel - Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:53:34 +0200
From:	Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Thorsten Leemhuis <regressions@...mhuis.info>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: 4.7-rc3: Reported regressions from 4.7

On Mon, 13 Jun 2016 13:02:21 +0200,
Borislav Petkov wrote:
> 
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2016 at 12:59:26PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> > and it could lead to confusion once a regression reporter puts some
> > crucial information into the tracking bug entry instead of posting it
> > to the proper place where the developers discuss the problem.
> 
> Right, this is where a single webpage would help when collecting all the
> relevant data/links for a regression, regardless of the bugtracker.

Well, Rafael created a bugzilla entry for tracking in the past, so
using bugzilla as tracking tool works in general.  It doesn't mean
it's the best option, of course, though.

In anyway, the only question is whether Thorsten feels comfortable or
not.


thanks,

Takashi