linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: 'UNKNOWN' status of opp-table->shared

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 12:27:03 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
Cc:	Rafael Wysocki <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <vireshk@...nel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gnurou@...il.com,
	linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM / OPP: 'UNKNOWN' status of opp-table->shared

On 16-06-16, 15:55, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On 06/16/2016 03:33 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns 0 even in the case where the OPP
> >core doesn't know if the table is shared or not. It is working for most
> >of the platforms, as the OPP table was never created and we returned
> >-ENODEV then.
> >
> >But in case of one of the platforms (Jetson TK1) at least, the situation
> >is a bit different. The OPP table is created (somehow) before
> >dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() is called and so we returned 0. The caller
> >of this routine treated that as 'CPUs don't share OPPs' and that had bad
> >consequences on performance.
> >
> >Fix this by converting 'shared_opp' to an integer and have an extra
> >value when its state in undefined. dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus() returns
> >-EINVAL now in that case, so that the caller can handle it accordingly
> >(cpufreq-dt considers that as 'all CPUs share the table').
> >
> >Fixes: 6f707daa3833 ("PM / OPP: Add dev_pm_opp_get_sharing_cpus()")
> >Reported-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>
> >Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> >---
> >Hi Alexandre,
> >
> >This is untested, can you please confirm if this fixes it for you?
> 
> Yep, with this cpufreq_init() takes the fallback path and cpufreq behaves as
> expected thereafter.
> 
> Thanks for reacting so quickly! Can this go into 4.7 fixes?

This will :)

> Tested-by: Alexandre Courbot <acourbot@...dia.com>

Thanks.

-- 
viresh