linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: max77686: Add support for MAX77620 clocks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:22:37 +0530
From:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
To:	Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@...sung.com>,
	<javier@....samsung.com>, <mturquette@...libre.com>,
	<robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux@...linux.org.uk>
CC:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>,
	<devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	<linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@...hile0.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] clk: max77686: Add support for MAX77620 clocks

Hi Krzysztof/Javier,
Thanks for review of the series.

I will post the V2 after taking care of all comment.

One query about the comment.

Thanks,
Laxman

On Thursday 16 June 2016 03:24 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 06/15/2016 04:13 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>>   enum chip_name {
>>   	CHIP_MAX77686,
>>   	CHIP_MAX77802,
>> +	CHIP_MAX77620,
> Now it is more obvious why it is here. However I don't like the
> duplication of device IDs, under different names and different values:
> 1. include/linux/mfd/max77686-private.h
> 2. include/linux/mfd/max77620.h
> 3. here
>
> I was thinking about way of combining it... but these headers are
> different. Unless there will be one header for all three devices.
>
> Anyway, please add the max77686 prefix to the enum.

so will it be:

enum max77686_chip_name {
     CHIP_MAX77686,
     CHIP_MAX77802,
     CHIP_MAX77620,
};


Will it be fine here?