linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mm: make faultaround produce old ptes"

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 15:27:35 +0300
From:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@...eaurora.org>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "mm: make faultaround produce old ptes"

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 02:20:02PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
> On Tue 14-06-16 11:42:29, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> > This reverts commit 5c0a85fad949212b3e059692deecdeed74ae7ec7.
> > 
> > The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.
> 
> Is the regression fully explained? My understanding from the email
> thread is that this is suspiciously too high. It is not like I would
> be against the revert but having an explanation would be really
> appreciated.

My understanding is that it's overhead on setting accessed bit:

http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160613125248.GA30109@black.fi.intel.com

-- 
 Kirill A. Shutemov