linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: disable irqs while holding css_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 16 Jun 2016 18:48:56 -0300
From:	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daolivei@...hat.com>
To:	Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <daolivei@...hat.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lgoncalv@...hat.com>,
	Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@....com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] cgroup: disable irqs while holding css_set_lock

On 06/07/2016 05:05 PM, Daniel Bristot de Oliveira wrote:
> On 06/07/2016 04:30 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
>> Is this something in mainline?  This forces all task free path to be
>> irq-safe, which *could* be fine but it's weird to make cgroup free
>> path irq-safe for something which isn't in mainline.
> 
> you mean, mainline linux kernel? if so, yes it is. I was running the
> v4.7-rc2 from Linus, as is.... no external patches applied.
> 

is there any other question/objection about this patch?

-- Daniel