lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 11:55:59 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
To:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, mgorman@...hsingularity.net,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm/page_owner: use stackdepot to store stacktrace

On Fri 17-06-16 16:25:26, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 03:56:04PM +0200, Michal Hocko wrote:
[...]
> > I still have troubles to understand your numbers
> > 
> > > static allocation:
> > > 92274688 bytes -> 25165824 bytes
> > 
> > I assume that the first numbers refers to the static allocation for the
> > given amount of memory while the second one is the dynamic after the
> > boot, right?
> 
> No, first number refers to the static allocation before the patch and
> second one is for after the patch.

I guess we are both talking about the same thing in different words. All
the allocations are static before the patch while all are dynamic after
the patch. Your boot example just shows how much dynamic memory gets
allocated during your boot. This will depend on the particular
configuration but it will at least give a picture what the savings might
be.
-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ