lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2016 02:56:59 +0200 From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org> To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>, Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>, "linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Steve Muckle <steve.muckle@...aro.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH V4 0/2] cpufreq: Sort policy->freq_table On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:17 PM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote: > On 08-06-16, 02:19, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: >> On Tuesday, June 07, 2016 03:55:13 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: >> > Hi Rafael, >> > >> > I have spent some more time on this stuff and finally came out with a >> > very simple solution. I hope you will like it more than the previous >> > versions. >> > >> > Instead of trying to sort the freq-table passed by the drivers, which >> > was complicated and would have broken some drivers for sure, this patch >> > just checks if the freq-table is sorted or not. >> > >> > If it is sorted, then we just use a different set of helpers for it. The >> > table can be sorted in both ascending and descending orders now and >> > helpers are present for both the cases. >> >> Well, that's something I was thinking about from the start. :-) >> >> > All the patches are pushed here for testing in case anyone wants to try: >> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/vireshk/pm.git cpufreq/sorted-freq-table >> > >> > V3->V4: >> > - Written from scratch really, completely different approach. >> >> I'll look at the code later this week. > > Hi Rafael, > > Did you get a chance to look at these? Steve may be blocked on this :) I know, but I have stuff to do other than cpufreq. And in particular regression fixes take precedence, of course.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists