lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Jun 2016 18:41:39 +0530
From:	Prasun Maiti <prasunmaiti87@...il.com>
To:	Amitkumar Karwar <akarwar@...vell.com>,
	Nishant Sarmukadam <nishants@...vell.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
	WiFi Mailing List <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Subject: [Query] mwifiex: few observations to reduce number of endian conversions

Hi Amitkumar,

I have two observations:

1. I have found that in the command response path for host command
"HostCmd_CMD_802_11_EEPROM_ACCESS", a "0" value has been endian
converted. It can only be a safe futuristic approach for any non-zero
value there however! Otherwise, the endian conversion can be removed.

2. For multiple Host Commands (e.g HostCmd_CMD_802_11_EEPROM_ACCESS
etc.) "cpu_to_leX"-converted values are saved to driver. So
"leX_to_cpu" conversion is required too many times afterwards in
driver.
On the contrary, we can save the values to driver without any
conversion, and only command buffer(s) are prepared with endian
converted values. In this way we can gain some efficiency [code size /
time] by reducing the number of endian conversion considerably.

Please let me know your opinion on the above.

-- 
Thanks,
Prasun

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ