lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 21 Jun 2016 23:14:43 +0000
From:	"Keller, Jacob E" <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
To:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	"Josh Poimboeuf" <jpoimboe@...hat.com>
Subject: sparse bad constant expression caused by 7322dd755e7d ("byteswap:
 try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug", 2016-05-05)

Hi,

I recently ran into a sparse error when running sparse on Intel's i40e kernel driver against v4.7-rc3.

  CC [M]  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_nvm.o
include/linux/sctp.h:172:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:174:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:172:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:174:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:175:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:176:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:177:51: error: bad constant expression
include/linux/sctp.h:178:51: error: bad constant expression

And similar. I ran a bisect and determined the offending commit was 7322dd755e7d ("byteswap: try to avoid __builtin_constant_p gcc bug", 2016-05-05)

I am not sure if this is a regression in sparse, a real issue, or something else?

Thanks,
Jake 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ