lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 15:41:06 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	stable@...r.kernel.org, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.4 44/75] memcg: add RCU locking around css_for_each_descendant_pre() in memcg_offline_kmem()

4.4-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>

commit 3a06bb78ceeceacc86a1e31133a7944013f9775b upstream.

memcg_offline_kmem() may be called from memcg_free_kmem() after a css
init failure.  memcg_free_kmem() is a ->css_free callback which is
called without cgroup_mutex and memcg_offline_kmem() ends up using
css_for_each_descendant_pre() without any locking.  Fix it by adding rcu
read locking around it.

    mkdir: cannot create directory `65530': No space left on device
    ===============================
    [ INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]
    4.6.0-work+ #321 Not tainted
    -------------------------------
    kernel/cgroup.c:4008 cgroup_mutex or RCU read lock required!
     [  527.243970] other info that might help us debug this:
     [  527.244715]
    rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
    2 locks held by kworker/0:5/1664:
     #0:  ("cgroup_destroy"){.+.+..}, at: [<ffffffff81060ab5>] process_one_work+0x165/0x4a0
     #1:  ((&css->destroy_work)#3){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffff81060ab5>] process_one_work+0x165/0x4a0
     [  527.248098] stack backtrace:
    CPU: 0 PID: 1664 Comm: kworker/0:5 Not tainted 4.6.0-work+ #321
    Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.9.1-1.fc24 04/01/2014
    Workqueue: cgroup_destroy css_free_work_fn
    Call Trace:
      dump_stack+0x68/0xa1
      lockdep_rcu_suspicious+0xd7/0x110
      css_next_descendant_pre+0x7d/0xb0
      memcg_offline_kmem.part.44+0x4a/0xc0
      mem_cgroup_css_free+0x1ec/0x200
      css_free_work_fn+0x49/0x5e0
      process_one_work+0x1c5/0x4a0
      worker_thread+0x49/0x490
      kthread+0xea/0x100
      ret_from_fork+0x1f/0x40

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20160526203018.GG23194@mtj.duckdns.org
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...tuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 mm/memcontrol.c |    3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -3661,6 +3661,7 @@ static void memcg_deactivate_kmem(struct
 	 * ordering is imposed by list_lru_node->lock taken by
 	 * memcg_drain_all_list_lrus().
 	 */
+	rcu_read_lock(); /* can be called from css_free w/o cgroup_mutex */
 	css_for_each_descendant_pre(css, &memcg->css) {
 		child = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
 		BUG_ON(child->kmemcg_id != kmemcg_id);
@@ -3668,6 +3669,8 @@ static void memcg_deactivate_kmem(struct
 		if (!memcg->use_hierarchy)
 			break;
 	}
+	rcu_read_unlock();
+
 	memcg_drain_all_list_lrus(kmemcg_id, parent->kmemcg_id);
 
 	memcg_free_cache_id(kmemcg_id);


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ