linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: qcom_rpm-regulator: Add support for pm8018 rpm regulator

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 22 Jun 2016 10:39:33 +0200
From:	Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
To:	Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc:	dmitry.torokhov@...il.com, andy.gross@...aro.org,
	david.brown@...aro.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, lgirdwood@...il.com,
	broonie@...nel.org, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
	alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com, linux-input@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-soc@...r.kernel.org, rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] regulator: qcom_rpm-regulator: Add support for pm8018
 rpm regulator

On 06/17/2016 06:53 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Fri 17 Jun 03:22 PDT 2016, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> 
>> In order to support eh Qualcomm MDM9615 SoC, add support for the
>> PM8018 RPM regulator in the qcom_rpm-regulator driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>
> [..]
>> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpm-regulator.c b/drivers/regulator/qcom_rpm-regulator.c
> [..]
>> +/**
>> + * enum rpm_vreg_voltage_corner - possible voltage corner values
>> + *
>> + * These should be used in regulator_set_voltage and rpm_vreg_set_voltage calls
>> + * for corner type regulators as if they had units of uV.
>> + */
>> +enum rpm_vreg_voltage_corner {
>> +	RPM_VREG_CORNER_NONE = 1,
>> +	RPM_VREG_CORNER_LOW,
>> +	RPM_VREG_CORNER_NOMINAL,
>> +	RPM_VREG_CORNER_HIGH,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct regulator_linear_range corner_ranges[] = {
>> +	REGULATOR_LINEAR_RANGE(RPM_VREG_CORNER_NONE, 0,
>> +				RPM_VREG_CORNER_HIGH, 1),
>> +};
>> +
>>  static int rpm_reg_write(struct qcom_rpm_reg *vreg,
> [..]
>> +
>> +static const struct qcom_rpm_reg pm8018_corner = {
>> +	.desc.linear_ranges = corner_ranges,
>> +	.desc.n_linear_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(corner_ranges),
>> +	.desc.n_voltages = 4,
>> +	.desc.ops = &uV_ops,
>> +	.parts = &rpm8018_corner_parts,
>> +};
>> +
> [..]
>> +static const struct rpm_regulator_data rpm_pm8018_regulators[] = {
> [..]
>> +	{ "dig_corner", QCOM_RPM_VOLTAGE_CORNER, &pm8018_corner,
>> +						      "vdd_dig_corner" },
>> +
>> +	{ }
>> +};
> 
> We have discussed the corners for a long time and I think we've
> concluded that they should be exposed as something like an OPP. What we
> have agreed on is that they should not be exposed as a regulator with
> voltages 1-4uV.
> 
> So please drop the corner for now.
> 
> Regards,
> Bjorn
> 
OK, dropped.

Thanks,
Neil